President Redirects Special Education and Child Nutrition Responsibilities to HHS
In a significant policy shift, President Donald Trump has announced plans to transfer the oversight of special education and child nutrition programs from the Department of Education to the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). This move, part of a broader effort to restructure federal education responsibilities, has sparked both support and concern among stakeholders.
Speaking from the Oval Office, President Trump stated that HHS, under the leadership of Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., would now manage “special needs and all of the nutrition programs and everything else.” The president emphasized that this change aims to streamline federal operations and enhance program efficiency.
For nearly five decades, the Department of Education has overseen the distribution of billions of dollars in grants to support students with disabilities through the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). Additionally, school meal programs have traditionally been managed by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. The proposed transition would require congressional approval, as these responsibilities are statutorily assigned to their respective agencies.
Education advocates have expressed concerns about the potential impact of this shift. Critics argue that moving special education oversight to HHS could disrupt the enforcement of IDEA and diminish collaboration with other education-focused offices. Similarly, transferring school meal programs raises questions about the continuity of services and alignment with agricultural policies.
Supporters of the move, however, believe it could foster better integration of health and education services. Secretary Kennedy has expressed readiness to take on these responsibilities, highlighting the potential for innovative approaches to supporting students with special needs and improving child nutrition.
The timeline for implementing these changes remains unclear, and the proposal has yet to gain congressional approval. As the debate unfolds, stakeholders continue to weigh the implications of this restructuring on students, families, and schools nationwide.





